2021 Antilia bomb scare case: Mumbai court grants bail to ex-policeman Sachin Vaze

You don’t have any Active Subscription.

Account subscription benefits alongside Premium Stories, Editorials, Opinions and more. Unlock these with Subscription

Sachin Vaze. File | Photo Credit: PTI

A special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court on Tuesday (September 29, 2026) granted bail to former policeman Sachin Vaze in the 2021 Antilia bomb scare and Mansukh Hiran murder case, saying the prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case of terrorism under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) against him.

Special Sessions Judge Chakor S. Baviskar said there is nothing on record to infer that the Ambani family was “terrorised” in any manner.

On February 25, 2021, an explosives-laden SUV was found near industrialist Mukesh Ambani’s residence ‘Antilia’ in south Mumbai. Businessman Masnukh Hiran, who was in possession of the SUV, was found dead in a creek in neighbouring Thane on March 5, 2021.

The court questioned the National Investigation Agency’s application of the stringent UAPA, noting the agency failed to record statements from any member of the Ambani family to prove they were terrorised.

“There is absolutely nothing on record even to infer by any stretch of imagination that the Ambanis or anyone of them is/was, are/were ever terrorised in any manner,” it said.

The court asserted that the day-to-day business of the Ambanis does not appear to have been disturbed even for a minute, from soon after the incident till this moment.

“Though according to the prosecution, Sachin Vaze wanted to strike terror or the act of the accused was likely to strike terror in the minds of Ambanis..., there is nothing on record to that effect,” it observed.

Furthermore, the court noted that the gelatin sticks found in the SUV parked near the Ambani residence lacked detonators, rendering them useless for an explosion and falling short of the “means” required to define a “terrorist act” under Section 15 of the UAPA.

Addressing the murder of businessman Mansukh Hiran, the court stated that while it was a homicidal death, it was not the direct outcome of a terrorist act.

The court noted that it remains an independent offence under Section 302 (murder) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which bypasses the stringent bail restrictions of the UAPA provisions.

It allowed Mr. Vaze’s bail application, directing his release on a personal bond of ₹1 lakh with a surety.

The prosecution has accused Mr. Vaze and others of forming a “terrorist gang” and entering into a criminal conspiracy between February and March 2021.

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.