Agentic Commerce Can Grow Your Revenue And Weaken Your Business
Rishi Katdare, Senior Leader in Networking and Edge for Global Financial Services at Amazon Web Services.
gettyA bank can recognize a customer, authenticate a cardholder, score a transaction for fraud, enforce a spending limit and reverse a payment. But what happens when the entity initiating the transaction is software acting for someone else?
Agentic commerce begins when a person or enterprise delegates buying decisions to software with discretion to choose among offers and act within an agreed scope. An AI agent may discover products, compare terms, select services and initiate purchases without the customer reviewing every choice.
Bot monetization is how a business earns a return when automated software uses its content, data or digital services. That return may come from charging for access, including usage in a subscription or allowing free access when an agent brings customers or sales. It is one commercial response within the broader shift to agentic commerce.
A bank may supply a product and retain its obligations to the customer while an agent’s operator determines which offers appear and how they are compared. The institution can remain accountable for what it sells while losing influence over how the customer chooses it.
I weigh an agent channel’s revenue against the costs and obligations the business retains. More machine activity can increase sales while worsening the economics of the customer relationship.
Businesses already handle automated orders, recurring charges and machine access. An agent’s identity, the customer it represents and the authority delegated to it are separate matters. Recognizing legitimate software does not establish whether it can purchase a service, disclose information or accept a continuing obligation.
Consider an agent permitted to buy a market-data report. The price falls within budget, but the selected offer includes an annual renewal. A payment network, bank and provider may each approve their part of the transaction without establishing whether the customer authorized that commitment.
A procurement agent may reorder an approved item, but needs additional approval to negotiate terms outside its mandate.
Repeated purchases below an individual spending limit can exceed the authority intended for the whole task. Enforce limits on the accumulated commitment as well as on what the agent may purchase or agree to.
Apply the represented customer’s entitlement to each request. One institution’s data subscription should not become permission for every customer using the same agent platform.
The first commercial mistake is pricing machine demand before understanding it. Leaders need to know which automated actors arrive, what they consume, what it costs to serve them and whether their activity produces customers or revenue.
If an agent retrieves an advertising-funded publisher’s article and answers the reader elsewhere, the information is consumed without the human visit that could have generated advertising revenue. The publisher still funds the content and its delivery, while the interaction may return neither a visit nor compensation.
An agent can also bring a qualified buyer, improve conversion or lower servicing costs. A business that blocks all machine access may obstruct useful demand, while indiscriminate access may subsidize someone else’s business.
Consider an agent routing an existing customer’s usual purchase through an intermediary that charges a fee. The company records growth in its agent channel, although demand has not increased and the sale now carries an additional fee.
I would ask finance to separate sales credited to an agent from additional business the enterprise would not have earned without it. Better retention or lower servicing costs can also justify the channel. Record those benefits separately, with the evidence and assumptions behind them.
Use a controlled pilot where practical to estimate what the agent changes. Compare results with customers using the existing route, accounting for differences in offers and customer mix. Measure the contribution after fees, servicing and exception costs. Use that evidence to negotiate the intermediary’s compensation and decide how much capital to commit to expanding the channel.
The pricing basis should follow the exchange. Several requests may support one useful comparison, while a single response may contain valuable proprietary research. Subscription rights, usage charges, licensing and referral arrangements serve different purposes. Choose terms the customer can understand and the business can enforce, including limits on redistribution. Restrict access when the expected return cannot justify the cost or exposure.
Where demand is still small, visibility and enforceable access terms may be the useful investment. A rising request count is insufficient evidence for a new revenue forecast.
If the operator earns a referral fee while the provider absorbs refunds, fraud and customer service, those costs belong in the margin calculation. Revenue cannot establish that a channel is profitable when the work required to sustain it sits in other teams’ budgets.
Distribution terms should also address how offers are ranked. If an intermediary can favor a paying partner, access to its customers does not guarantee that your product will receive a fair comparison.
Governance has to make those responsibilities enforceable. Name the business owner accountable for the offer, the authority accepted and the handling of exceptions. Establish who can suspend further activity and who will resolve commitments already made. Revoking access will not retrieve delivered information or automatically unwind an accepted purchase.
Evidence must connect the customer’s instructions, the terms accepted and the action taken. Retain enough to investigate a disputed transaction without collecting customer information simply because it might prove useful. Agree across the parties how disputes, refunds and recovery will be handled before expanding autonomy.
I would review one commercially meaningful transaction with the business owner, finance and risk. Have the team demonstrate how it verifies authority, investigates a disputed charge and stops further activity. Then examine the return after servicing costs and exception work. If nobody can reconcile the transaction with the customer’s instructions or account for its full cost, expansion is premature.
The next arrival at the digital door may be software. The enterprise still has to know who sent it, what authority it has, what value is changing hands and who remains accountable when the machine acts.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
