B.C. tribunal weighs in on who gets Walter the dog after women split - National Post
A dog similar to this one was recently the subject of a civil resolution tribunal out of British Columbia to determine who gets the pup when a couple splits.Article contentWhen couples split up, who gets the family pooch is more about money than love, according to a civil resolution tribunal out of British Columbia.
The tribunal heard the case of former romantic partners Misty Donovan and Makenzie Jade Murray who ended their two-year relationship in April 2024. The two women shared their dog, Walter, for another 10 months while living apart. Then in February 2025, Murray kept Walter and refused to bring him to Donovan’s home, where he’d been spending weekends.
Donovan asked the tribunal for an order requiring Murray to return Walter, who appears to be a Boston Terrier in their social media photos of him.
“While she claims $2,500, it is clear Ms. Donovan wants the dog, not monetary compensation,” said tribunal member Alissa Reynolds in the Sept. 23 decision that declares a dog, though loved like a child, is not in fact a child.
The tribunal’s task was not to award custody, Reynolds said, but to divide property, albeit nothing like a sofa or an espresso maker.
“The courts have recognized that animals are a unique form of personal property because they are living creatures and not inanimate objects,” she wrote in the decision.
“This means when pet-owners separate and there is a dispute about the pet, the question is who owns the pet rather than who should have ‘custody’ of it.”
Relevant factors to consider, Reynolds said, include “who bought and selected the pet, who attended its veterinary appointments, who paid for the pet’s needs, who licensed it, and how the parties viewed ownership.”
Murray chose Walter, noted the adjudicator.
“She provided her messages to the breeder that show this. She says Ms. Donovan was not involved in selecting Walter, and Ms. Donovan did not deny that. So, I find this factor favours Ms. Murray.”
