Michael Higgins: Women assaulted in prison by trans inmates doesn't violate Charter, Liberals say
The Edmonton Institution for Women. Photo by Larry Wong /PostmediaArticle contentThe word “female” is so objectionable to our federal government that it cannot even be used in a court case involving women being sexually abused in prison.
“Cisgender woman” is the preferred term used by the Canadian government allegedly for reasons of “clarity and accuracy.”
Cisgender woman, as opposed to female, is used “to refer to individuals whose gender identity corresponds to the gender assigned to them at birth based on observed sexual characteristics,” says the government in a recent statement of defence.”
It adds that the “use of the term ‘female’ to refer solely to cisgender women risks mischaracterizing or misgendering gender diverse inmates, and this Defence avoids that usage for clarity and accuracy.”
The National Post newsletter that doesn’t hold back, giving readers the unvarnished truth on media, politics and culture.
A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.
The next issue of Right? will soon be in your inbox.
We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again
Having erased female as a category, is it any wonder that the government goes on to argue that putting biological males into women’s prisons is fine as long as they identify as women?
Further, the government insists that if the women inmates — the biological females — are sexually assaulted by the “gender diverse” prisoners — the biological men — that it is not a breach of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
This is not just madness, it is unhinged, demented and dangerous lunacy.
Last year, Reem Alsalem, the UN special rapporteur on violence against women and girls, wrote a report condemning gender ideology because it was deleting women from society.
“The erosion of women and sex specific language, the conflation of sex, gender and gender identity” was weakening protection for mothers, women and girls, she said in a speech before producing her report.
She might have added that it has weakened protection for female prisoners in Canada.
Only in Canada can we have a judge saying bike lanes are protected by the Charter but the federal government arguing that women at risk of being sexually abused in prison aren’t.
