Who Is Michael Desronvil? Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Breaks Silence - Newsweek

The lone juror who blocked a unanimous insanity verdict in the Lindsay Clancy murder trial has spoken out, saying he believed prosecutors presented enough evidence to show the Massachusetts mother knew what she was doing when she killed her three young children.

Clancy, 36, was charged with three counts of first-degree murder over the January 2023 deaths of her children: 5-year-old Cora, 3-year-old Dawson and 8-month-old Callan. Her defense claimed she was suffering from postpartum psychosis, excusing her from criminal responsibility. After seven days of deliberations the 12-member jury was unable to reach a unanimous decision, and Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial.

“I didn’t have any doubts. As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence present," Michael Desronvil explained in a statement provided to CBS via representative Ray Marcel and to NewsNation. "Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses, and what the prosecution presents, I thought it was enough proof that she knew exactly what she was doing and planned.“

His comments come after other jurors recently claimed Desronvil had acknowledged having reasonable doubt but did not join other jurors in finding the defendant not guilty by reason of insanity.Newsweek has approached Marcel and attorneys representing Clancy in messages sent outside of regular working hours.

The trial, which drew worldwide attention, centered on whether Clancy was criminally responsible when she killed her three children at their Duxbury, Massachusetts, home. Clancy did not dispute that she strangled her three children before attempting to take her own life. Instead, her defense argued that she was suffering from severe postpartum psychosis and had been misdiagnosed and overmedicated despite repeatedly seeking mental health treatment. She pleaded not guilty to charges of murder.

Prosecutors argued that Clancy remained capable of understanding right from wrong when her children were killed and pointed to evidence they said showed planning. They also disputed that she was psychotic at the time and said that she understood the nature of her actions.

After several weeks of testimony, jurors deliberated for seven days but failed to unanimously decide whether Clancy was criminally responsible for the killings. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4 after the jury reported it was hopelessly deadlocked. Jurors later said 11 favored finding her not guilty by reason of insanity while one, Desronvil, disagreed.

The case sparked national debate over postpartum psychosis and how the criminal justice system should treat defendants suffering from severe maternal mental illness.

Several jurors who served alongside Desronvil in the trial have criticized his approach to deliberations. In interviews after the trial, some of the jurors said they believed Desronvil was unwilling to adequately consider their arguments.

Jury foreperson Roni Carlson told NBC10 Boston that Desronvil, who at the time of the interviews was not publicly identified, at one stage acknowledged having reasonable doubt, but that he nevertheless refused to agree that Clancy should be found not criminally responsible.

Fellow juror Paula Devlin described Desronvil as “very arrogant” during deliberations and said other jurors repeatedly went through medical and toxicology evidence in an effort to address his concerns. Devlin later told CBS News that the increasingly isolated juror may have felt attacked as the panel moved toward an 11-1 split.

Another juror, Nick Dargie, said Desronvil would at times not engage when other panelists asked him to identify evidence supporting his position.

"There was several times I would ask him to show us evidence or describe a witness testimony that helped to prove what he was saying, and he couldn't,” Dargie told NBC10 Boston.

Dargie also said he was “shocked” when the holdout used an exercise band and water bottle during deliberations to recreate how the children had been strangled.

"I think that I was just so shocked that he did that. I was shocked,” Dargie said. “It didn't make any sense to me. We're not in there to play detective. It's not a game of Clue. This is serious. I asked him why he was doing that."

Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Tobias Meyjes and Tony Phillips.

This is a developing story and will be updated.

If you or someone you know is considering suicide, please contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline by calling or texting 988, or visit 988lifeline.org. You can also text HOME to 741741 to reach Crisis Text Line.